Yeah...not so good at photoshop |
Here's an example. Toms Shoes. Great slip on, comfy shoes that are understandably really popular right now. I love these shoes (and really, really want a pair of red ones) but I am resisting buying them. Toms utilizes a "buy my product and we'll donate" business plan. For every pair of shoes a consumer purchases, they send a pair to a needy child in Africa. On first thought, this sounds innovative, entrepreneurial, and downright awesome. But what about the children in Africa who actually don't need shoes? As Americans, it's impossible for us to imagine that a shoeless culture could be functional, but maybe, just maybe, this is okay there. (I admit that this could be a bit of a reach, but am using it as an example of disregarding cultural differences when directing our support.) Even more importantly, Toms chooses to address a symptom of a problem, in this case, shoelessness, instead of the larger problem itself (poverty). They may do more damage than good by putting African shoemakers, cobblers, and other employees out of business. If you take away jobs, you create more poverty.
I don't want to criticize those who find value in this because trust me, it's not as if I think I'm changing the world one little budding ballerina at a time, but like with Merwin's poem or the need for more equity, I hope for more understanding. I know I'm naive about "fixing" the world, but if more people stopped to think about what we're dealing with we might get somewhere better, faster.
I love this. Constructive helping is something I think about too. I think, first, we all have to get good at seeing other people as people, other cultures as cultures and other countries as countries, the same way we are people, cultures, countries, etc...
ReplyDeleteIt can be uncomfortable to place ourselves in someone else's shoes and more attractive an option to throw some money at a problem from a comfortable distance. But, we should stop and investigate the programs through which we are "helping."
I also take issue with Toms because of the effects on shoemakers. And, i'm deeply cynical about the effectiveness of any company's philanthropy as I think the impetus tends to be less altruism and more marketing and image control.
Doing good is great. But, doing better good than we're doing now would be awesome.
Also, fantastic picture. If you ever run for office...